| Bugbrooke LINK
...the website for the village of Bugbrooke, Northamptonshire
This Village notice board is where your feedback and items of interest can be displayed for others to see and comment upon. Send us your input via the Feedback Page. You can raise subjects of village interest, make observations, ask questions, or notify the community of items lost or found. The more it is used the more useful this notice board will be. We reserve the right not to display any item we feel may be offensive or distressing to others.
Housing Development in Bugbrooke 6/3/10, 18/3/10, 21/3/10
Stitch 'n' Bitch Club 22/8/08
Book Club 22/8/08
Family History 1/6/08
Policing Correspondence. 22/5/08 3/6/08 6/6/08
Correspondence on Stan Clark's articles 8/1/08 9/1/08 15/1/08
Pizza Van 28/11/07
Grumpy Old Women 13/8/07
Grass Snakes in the Garden 7/8/07
Parish Council Minutes 13/3/07 15/3/07 19/3/07
Johns Road Field 7/3/07 19/3/07 22/4/07 9/4/08 12/4/08
Lost Keys 16/2/07
Cricket Club Fixtures 16/2/07
Badgers Close 6/2/07
From Alan 21/3/10
Unfortunately I was unable to attend the recent Planning meeting and
so have been reading with interest other peoples comments.
Shaun Walton, 25 SmitherWay, NN7 3PT
I don't know whether a few comments on my thoughts on the planning meeting are of any interest - but i thought i'd send them anyway.)
I regret that Wednesday's public planning meeting didn't do much to reassure me that the village environment is in safe hands regarding development. Firstly i'd say that there was potential bias as both the speakers have an interest in keeping the development ball rolling as their jobs depend on it. The chap from SNDC droned on about difficult procedural technicalities and agreed directives, but i'm not sure that this is what the average villager is interesred in. The only member of the audience that looked as if he might actually ask some cutting and relevant questions was thrice shouted down by the speakers. Another questioner accused us all of being NIMBYs, when in fact, many are very concerned about the general environment and the un-sustainable rates of expansion that threaten its (and our) future. I wondered if councillors were aware that, over the last century, Bugbrooke has twice doubled in size? It has more than doubled since the 1960s. It doesn't take Einstein to work out that this cannot continue either on a village level, or in the wider world. I also wasn't impressed with the other audience member who suggested that we all had our chances to object at parish council meetings. Had i the energy and confidence to open my mouth at this point, i would have told him that many people have families and long working hours that must take priority out of necessity. A big turnout should show our elected representatives the level of local feeling about un-democratically imposed development but it appeared, at least to me, that councillors were still not fully acknowledging the drift of public opinion. By their own admission, almost with open arms, the parish council appear to be welcoming up to 111 houses. The logic that this gives us leverage against further future development is extremely flawed as it's obvious that those profiting from development will see this as a submissive gesture from the local council, therefore giving the green light to push for more development hence more profit at the expense of the village and its environment. I was also dissappointed that some members of the public have been successfully persuaded to accept the 111 figure based on the fact that the rules are set by those further up the pyramid of power. I did notice that all official representatives blame developmental imposition on someone higher up in government. To say that we are just doing as we are told by those further up the command chain is not a good enough excuse for innaction or unchallenged compliance. Those who worked in wartime concentration camps have been known to give the same excuse. There was no mention of the "pre-application discussions in respect of 222 dwellings in the village," as mentioned in November parish notes, and i regret that i failed to speak out to point out that the WNJPU wouldn't waste time and money on these consultations if they didn't think there was a chance of implementation of the potential site proposals. This is why councillors should be at the forefront of leading and showing development quangos etc, that Bugbrooke can offer a strong opposition. I thought that the message might get through when many people protested on development, by voting for me a few years ago, but instead it looks like we have a Chamberlain style appeasement regarding the developmental profiteers. If we need more evidence that the electorate are opposed to housing developments then i'm considering getting the support of a handful of parishioners to initiate a parish referendum under the conditions of the 1972 Local Government Act, schedule 12, part 3, paragraph 18. This would be trouble and expense but would prove the consolidated and democratic public opposition to these imposed developments. Tony Benn always says that true change begins with grass roots politics, so it should be a councillors duty to represent grass roots opinion by taking a stand against un-beneficial agendas imposed from above. I realise that councillors have limited power, but they do have the power to act as a mouthpiece of the electorate rather than hiding behind the psychological barriers of bureauocracy, rule and regulation.
My comments are nothing personal and are aimed at elected representatives on every level. It's easy to criticise, but having made my criticisms i'd like to thank everyone for their efforts in organising the meeting and the increased effort and transparency in keeping the electorate informed. Shaun Walton. 0A
just read the parish council response (posted on Link website,) to the
West Northants Development Corporation's (WNDC) consultation paper on
potential development sites that could possibly be imposed on Bugbrooke, and
other planning policies and proposals put forward by the district council.
Mike Phillipson 3rd February 2009
I have just read the note in the latest LINK and whilst I was abroad during the recent birdwatch, I thought you might be interested to know that on 5th January, we were visited by a flock of 15 Waxwings which we were able to observe for about 25 minutes as they ate red berries in our garden.
Hi, I am trying to find out what happenedd to my father's
younger brother Peter, and their parents. My father's name is Thomas Henry
Morris, born 17/10/1921. He thinks they were killed in a car crash? in
Laura Pugh 07971 166421
Stitch 'n' Bitch Club - Any kind of stitchers /
knitters / sewers. From beginners to the experienced - all are
welcome. Advice and general chat a must!
Laura Pugh 07971 166421
I would like to set up a Bugbrooke Book Club in the village to meet once a month. I would like to know if anyone would be interested - maybe meeting the 3rd Thursday evening of each month, everyone takes it in turn to choose a book then everyone reads it and we meet up to chat about it. This would be an informal club, the only thing would be that you have to read the book and turn up regularly!
The book club will be the third Thursday of every month at the 5 Bells. First meeting Thursday 16th October 7.30pm
Pamela Smith 1/6/08
I am doing some research on my family history and find
that John Wheeler, the candle maker and Baptist minister was my 4xgreat
grandfather. If you know of anyone with further details or pictures I'd be
grateful if they would get in touch with me.
Geoff Cooke 6/6/08
The LINK Police article had an incorrect web reference at the end of it. If you follow this link to http://www.northants.police.uk/beatstats/ and then open the PDF against Beat Stats -by beat, and then do a search for Bugbrooke, you will see all of the statistics for the Bugbrooke beat. Interesting reading, and presumably reflecting the fact we have Campion in the village.
Chris Groves-Kirkby 3/6/08
"Crime Down in Northamptonshire" - Link, June
Thanks to your office I've been in touch with Stan clarke and now Ken Gardner phoned me today If I send you a email about my early days in the Village It might need some-one to edit it would that be o.k.
John Leach 15/1/08
Thank you for your quick reply. Stan gave me a bell tonight we had a very long chat on the phone I now have his phone Number and will be in touch on and about my time spent in the Village during those dark days we all had in those war years. He wants me to put pen to paper for which I will do in my own time because their was so much going on within the Village, We did have German P O W's working for Belgrove's what we got for a bar of soap was nobody's business. More on that later on.
John Leach 9/1/08
I lived in Bugbrooke from 1940 until 1947 when I was called back to Dr Barnardo's. Me and Bill French was not evacuees but boarded out to 4 Gilkes Yard, to Mrs Laura Clark. Boy! Has Stan Clark rung a few bells about the old Village. I was the little lad who was under the belfry door when that thunderstorm hit the spire. There was only Mrs Clark and me in the churchyard that evening in July 1940. I can come back on that evening anytime as I recall it. Maybe you might be able to put Mrs Clark's name right and that evacuee's bit right on Stan page's because both Bill & me was Dr Barnardo's boys. Many Thanks
John Leach 8/1/08
Does anyone know what is happening with the pizza van man? - or any other type of take away service in the village - I keep seeing it mentioned then nothing since!
Laura Pugh, 28/11/07
My earlier comment about being delighted at having found
this webpage was very much an understatement. I was, and still am,
actually thrilled beyond words.
Thanks to the editor at a Northamptonshire website, I have
recently been able to acquire a copy of "Bugbrooke 2000 BC to 2000
AD", published by the Bugbrooke Historical Society. What a
Am I the only person to feel that the Link magazine has developed a slightly grumpy tone in recent editions? The suggestion by the editor that the regular "Grumpy Old Women" item should spawn a "Grumpy Old Men" slot surprises me. Also the article entitled "With Deep Regret" is very much in the same depressing vein. Is Link's target audience the middle-aged and elderly in the village, and only those who are disgruntled? Is there no one living in Bugbrooke with a happier point of view? The results of the village survey certainly suggest that Bugbrooke is generally a good place to live, so why harp on about the few minor irritations. Yes, other people can be annoying, but wouldn't we rather live in a community instead of alone in splendid isolation. Come on Link, think more positively! We are not all downhearted
No name provided
I saw a young grass snake come out of our garden pool. Is this unusual ? Has anyone else in the village seen them in their garden ?
BRUFC would like to say thank you to the following companies and
people for donating a
13th March 07, Time: 11:25:05
'Yes Geoff you are absolutely correct, the minutes are posted once they have been formally approved by the Council at their next meeting, therefore they are always running a month behind. This is exactly the same as if you were to read them on the village notice boards or vistied the Parish Office to look at them. The most up to date way to find out what is going on is to attend a PC meeting, parishioners are always most welcome and there is 10 minutes public question time set aside for comments & questions.'
Cheers - Emma (Clerk to the Parish Council.) 19/3/07
12th April 2008 from Malcolm Shipman
This is possibly the same thing although I don't take the
22nd April 07 Note from Emma Bignell, Clerk to the Parish Council
of the considerable concern over the future of this land, I have spoken at
length with the Planning Policy Officer at South Northamptonshire Council
to gain an up to date report on planning policy in the district. He
confirms that the land at the end of Johns Road is outside the village
boundary and no plans have been submitted to develop it.
whilst the County Structure Plan is technically in place until 2016, which
is the main planning policy document that the district and borough
councils draw from to create their own planning frameworks, he
acknowledged that in recent years, new government guidance has been issued
regionally which has had a profound effect on planning frameworks. The
most significant of these is in respect of new housing and the levels at
which this has been set. The ’Regional Spatial Strategy’ has therefore
superseded many local plans and placed greater pressure on local Borough
& District Councils in terms of housing allocation.
what does all this mean for Bugbrooke? Within the next 12 to 24 months
South Northamptonshire Council will be required to review their planning
policies. They will look at potential locations for new housing in all the
villages across the district and go out to public consultation. It is
therefore vitally important that the parish is aware of all potential
development sites, this may include the land at the end of Johns Road.
However it will undoubtedly also include other Greenfield sites and we
would like to have advance views from parishioners of preferred options
(if any), so that we can be ready for the public consultation.
we would like to invite you to the Parish Plan Exhibition on Tuesday 1st
May between 2 & 8 pm at the Community Centre to express your views on
whether you think Bugbrooke should expand & if so, where you think
future housing should be located.
19th March 07 Response to the letter below.
Emma Bignell the Clerk to the Parish Council on the March 12th Parish Council Meeting:-
We had around 80 parishioners present at the start of the March meeting. There appears to have been a lot of concern as to why this field has been cleared. I have received a response from the land agent for the Harrison Trust (who own the land). He confirms that the land has been cleared following complaints from local residents about noise and nuisance and so that it can be put back to grassland. It is outside the village boundary and is designated 'open countryside' so there is no possibility of it being built upon over the next few years. The land is not 'conservation area' land nor did any of the trees have preservation orders on them. It is agricultural land and will remain as such until the current planning development framework set by South Northamptonshire Council expires in 2016. If after that time there were to be any change to the status of this land, then there would need to be public consultation and the Parish Council would ensure that all residents had the opportunity to comment. The other matter which was noted, is that the public footpath which runs across this land is likely to be reinstated but in its correct position around the edge of the field, which should make it easier for walkers to stick to. I hope this helps to clarify the issue and reassure residents that the land is not going to be developed upon in the near future.
7th March 07
Are you interested in why the field at the bottom of Johns Road has been cleared ?
Do you want to have a say in what is happening in our village ?
The Parish Council meeting is on Monday 12th March in the Green Room at the Community Centre 7.30pm. One of the points being raised is the field.
Please go along and voice you opinion - because your opinion counts !!!
Jennie Jones 7th March
I had lost my car keys on August 17th probably on footpath past Florist shop, on the days following I enquired at local shops including the Post Office but to no avail. 10 days later I was given them back at The Stores by The Green. I would like to thank the person who handed them in if they would like to get in touch. Also I would suggest that any lost item is always taken to the same place, The Stores, which are open longer hours & the owner would stand a better chance of getting their property back. The management of the Stores have agreed to this suggestion.
Peter White 830452
16th February 2007
I thought you may like to know this for your Nature Notes and if anyone
else has spotted this creature roaming the streets in the early hours.
6th February 2007